Liquidation preference is a critical term in fundraising negotiations, affecting how much founders and common shareholders receive in an exit event. It prioritizes investor payouts before distributing any remaining proceeds to others, such as founders and employees.
What is Liquidation Preference?
Liquidation preference dictates how proceeds from a sale, merger, or dissolution of the company are divided. Investors with preferred stock often recover their investment before common shareholders like founders. This structure protects investors but can leave founders with less in modest exit scenarios.
Types of Liquidation Preferences
1. Non-Participating Liquidation Preference: Investors recover their investment first, with any remaining funds going to common shareholders. For example, in a 1x liquidation preference, investors get back exactly what they invested.
2. Participating Liquidation Preference: Here, investors recover their investment and also share in the upside with common shareholders. This "double dip" reduces the payout for founders, especially in smaller exits.
3. Capped Participating Liquidation Preference: Investors recover their investment and participate in the upside up to a certain multiple (e.g., 2x). After hitting the cap, the remaining proceeds are distributed solely to common shareholders. This balances investor protection with founder upside.
The Real-World Impact on Founders: Funding Scenarios
Consider these scenarios to understand the effects of liquidation preferences:
Case 1: Non-Participating Liquidation Preference
An investor with a 1x liquidation preference in a $15 million exit recovers $10 million, leaving $5 million for the founders.
Case 2: Participating Liquidation Preference
With a 1x participating liquidation preference, the investor first receives $10 million, then shares in the remaining $5 million, reducing the founder's share.
Case 3: Capped Participating Liquidation Preference (2x Cap)
The investor recovers $10 million, participates until their total payout reaches $20 million, and leaves the remainder for common shareholders.
These scenarios illustrate how liquidation preferences can significantly impact founder returns, especially in lower value exits.
Why Liquidation Preference Matters for Founders
Liquidation preferences can dilute founder returns. Participating preferences without caps are particularly impactful, allowing investors to take a larger share of the exit proceeds. Moreover, stacking preferences from multiple rounds of funding can leave little for founders in smaller exits.
Founders should also be wary of clauses like dividends and multiples, where investors may negotiate to receive 2x or 3x their original investment before common shareholders see any payout. These terms can have a substantial impact on the final distribution of proceeds.
Strategies for Negotiating Liquidation Preferences
To protect their interests, founders should:
Cap Participation: Negotiate a cap on participation, ensuring that investors stop participating in the upside after reaching a reasonable return.
Model Exit Scenarios: Work with advisors to understand how different liquidation preferences affect various exit outcomes, ensuring that founders remain adequately compensated.
Limit Stacking Preferences: In later funding rounds, limit stacked preferences to avoid having multiple investor groups take priority over common shareholders.
Conclusion: Know the Terms, Protect Your Future
Liquidation preferences are vital to protecting investors but can drastically reduce returns for founders. Understanding these terms and negotiating favorable conditions can help founders secure their future upside while still offering fair protections for investors. Always work with experienced advisors to ensure balanced agreements.
Kommentit